Title

Text Resize
Print
Email
Subsribe to RSS Feed

Wednesday November 22, 2017

Private Letter Ruling

Science and Technology Consulting Org Denied Exemption

GiftLaw Note:
Organization applied for tax exempt status under Sec. 501(c)(3). The Articles of Incorporation state that Organization is organized for charitable, educational, civic, community welfare and scientific purposes. Organization states that it will advise educational institutions and governments on research, development, business and education in science and technology and will create tools for commercializing innovation for educational and research organizations. Organization will provide infrastructure for commercializing innovative products and services, focusing primarily on life sciences and emerging technologies. Organization will provide consulting services to a wide audience and will charge fees based on time and resources applied to each situation.

For an organization to be recognized as tax-exempt under Sec. 501(c)(3), it must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes. Under Reg. 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(1), an organization is not organized exclusively for exempt purposes if its articles of organization do not limit its purposes to one or more exempt purposes. Under Reg. 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1), an exempt organization is not operated for exempt purposes if more than an insubstantial part of its activities do not further an exempt purpose. In Rev. Rul. 69-528, the Service ruled that an organization that provided investment services to exempt organizations for a fee was not exempt under Sec. 501(c)(3). The Service cited several cases in which the courts had determined that the organizations' activities were commercial in nature. The Service determined that Organization was similar to the organization in Rev. Rul 69-528 and was neither organized nor operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes. Therefore, the Service denied Organization's application for tax exempt status.
PLR 201733015 Science and Technology Consulting Org Denied Exemption

8/18/2017 (5/22/2017)

Dear * * *:

We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Based on the information provided, we determined that you don't qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. This letter explains the basis for our conclusion. Please keep it for your records.

Issues


Do you qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code? No, for the reasons stated below.

Facts


You were incorporated on B in the state of C. Your Articles of Incorporation state that you are organized exclusively for charitable, educational, civic, community welfare and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code.

You have three board members. Two of your three board members are related, by marriage.

You will provide intellectual and organizational infrastructure for commercializing innovative products and services. You primarily focus on life sciences and emerging technologies. You plan to partner with universities, research institutions and other nonprofits to identify solutions that enhance commercial and social value and accessibility.

You are a team committed to leveraging emerging business disruptions to improve innovation commercialization tackling the world's boldest challenges. You provide partners the tools, talent and infrastructure to build companies, create quality jobs, and attract investment. You take solutions into the world via partnered initiatives and launching new ventures.

You explain your activities as follows:

1. You strengthen innovation systems by helping establish innovation hubs and launch pods. Specifically, you will advise universities and local governments on establishing strategic innovation districts for research, development, business and education mainly in biomedical sciences, information technology, and clean energy technologies. Your objective is to promote the creation of an ecosystem for innovation supporting the people, academic institutions and corporations in their discovery and development of innovative products and services that can lead to economic growth and diversification, high value employment, and social impact. Your main tasks include the following:
  • Create innovation centers around selected targeted industries and segments,
  • Create programs for the introduction of people and exchange of ideas and knowledge,
  • Support the creation, attraction, and retention of science and technology companies with solid offerings, and
  • Partner with local, regional and international organizations to foster entrepreneurship and help attract funding to support growth and sustainability.
2. You will design new methods to evaluate and commercialize research innovation generated by universities and research organizations. You create actionable tools for sourcing, evaluating, de-risking, developing, and commercializing innovation across sectors and professional silos of knowledge. Your objective is to support both universities and research organizations in streamlining their product development and technology transfer initiatives. Your main tasks include the following:
  • Assemble experts to perform due diligence and evaluate customer discovery and further commercial viability,
  • Conduct initial scientific and technology assessments to perform initial low cost de-risk experimentations,
  • Create prototypes, run concept validations, and run pre-clinical and clinical experiments,
  • Advise on the creation and license of intellectual property, and
  • Advise on the creation of companies (strategic and operating direction, commercialization of assets, etc.).
3. You will design new value-based commercialization models to support access to critical treatments with high global health impact. You provide the design and implementation of pay-for-success value-based commercialization model, increasing access to innovative medicines while reducing overall healthcare costs. You operate as a solution provider to more efficiently align intellectual property and distribution rights, procurement financing, manufacturing, impact monitoring and treatment programs. You work with academic institutions, advocacy organizations, innovators, generic companies, and governments to structure and manage win-win arrangements that expand healthcare access. Some of your main tasks are:

  • Identify the country's health system priorities for value-based commercialization,
  • Develop therapeutic treatment and indication feasibility assessments,
  • Gather and analyze critical health data, and
  • Determine the infrastructure planning required to facilitate access to critical medicines (auditing infrastructure, reimbursement process, healthcare outreach capacity, medicine supply infrastructure, manufacturing capacity, technology transfer, etc.).
4. You will create consortiums of industry and academic organizations to streamline insights and research data that may be useful for accelerating drug discovery and development. You will create an analytics consortium to improve medicine discovery and development with the participation of healthcare analytics firms, pharma and biotechnology companies, clinical researchers, and universities. The consortium combines solutions for:
  • Secure data management with licensing,
  • Finance innovations to create a win-win incentive structure,
  • Accelerating and cutting costs for preclinical and clinical trial research,
  • Integration of supply and vendor offerings, and
  • Opportunities to streamline R&D and manufacturing.
Your services are not limited to a narrow audience and you will charge for services based on time and resources applied to each specific engagement and task of activities. You advertise the services you provide on your website.

You set your fees based on the scope, size and nature of the engagement. This includes the amount of work required to assess the feasibility of undertaking a project, the materials and resources required, including internal or external resources, travel expenses, any additional equipment required, accommodations, organizations operating expenses, etc. Basically, you said, the fee to be charged would be based on all general considerations and costs related to the task and assessed prior to taking on any assignment or project.

You submitted a sample consulting agreement (you have not yet entered into any agreements). The contract appears to be a standard consulting contract which legally binds the consultant (you) to perform specific work, as outlined in the Statement of Work as it relates to the contract, for a company.

You will pay third parties to provide assistance securing business and grant development opportunities. Commissions will be between D and E percent. You anticipate that approximately F percent of your revenue will come from gross receipts from services performed and the remaining G percent from gifts, grants and contributions. You also anticipate that approximately H percent of your revenue will be expended on compensation of officers/directors and for salaries.

Law


Section 501(c)(3) of the Code provides for the exemption from federal income tax to organizations organized and operated exclusively for charitable or educational purposes, provided no part of the net earnings inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treasury Regulation Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) states that, in order to be exempt as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, an organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(1) provides that an organization is organized exclusively for one or more exempt purposes only it its articles of organization limit its purposes to one or more exempt purposes and do not expressly empower it to engage, otherwise than as an insubstantial part of its activities, in activities which themselves are not in furtherance of one or more exempt purposes.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) provides that an organization will be regarded as "operated exclusively" of one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which accomplish one or more of such exempt purposes specified in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. An organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.

Rev. Rul. 69-528, 1969-2 C.B. 127, states that an organization formed to provide investment services on a fee basis exclusively to organizations exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code is not exempt under Section 501(c)(3).

In Rev. Rul. 72-369, 1972-2 C.B. 245, an organization was formed to provide managerial and consulting services to organizations exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code to improve the administration of their charitable programs. The organization enters into agreements with unrelated Section 501(c)(3) organizations to furnish managerial and consulting services on a cost basis. Providing managerial and consulting services on a regular basis for a fee is a trade or business ordinarily carried on for profit. The fact that the services in this case are provided at cost and solely for exempt organizations is not sufficient to characterize this activity as charitable within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3). Furnishing the services at cost lacks the donative element necessary to establish this activity as charitable.

In American Institute for Economic Research v. United States, 302 F.2d 934 (Ct. Cl. 1962), the Court considered the status of an organization that provided analysis of securities and industries and of the economic climate in general. It sold subscriptions to various periodicals and services providing advice for purchases of individual securities. The Court concluded that the totality of the organization's activities, which included the sale of many publications as well as the sale of advice for a fee to individuals, was more indicative of a business than that of an educational organization. The Court held that the organization had a significant non-exempt commercial purpose that was not incidental to the educational purpose and that the organization was not entitled to be regarded as exempt.

In B.S.W. Group, Inc. v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 352 (1978), the Tax Court held that an organization did not qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3) because it was primarily engaged in an activity that was characteristic of a trade or business and ordinarily carried on by for-profit commercial businesses. The Tax Court stated: "We must agree with the Commissioner that petitioner's activity constitutes the conduct of a consulting business of the sort which is ordinarily carried on by commercial ventures organized for profit."

In Living Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner, 950 F.2d 365 (7th Cir. 1991), the Court of Appeals upheld a Tax Court decision that the activities were conducted as a business and the organization was in direct competition with other restaurants and health food stores; thus it did not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3). The appellate court stated the factors that the court relied on to explain commerciality included:

1) The organization sold goods and services to the public.
2) The organization was in direct competition with for profit businesses (food stores and restaurants).
3) The prices set by the organization were based on pricing formulas common in retail food businesses.
4) The organization utilized promotional materials and "Commercial catch phrases" to enhance sales.
5) The organization advertised its services and food.
6) The organization did not receive any charitable contributions.

In Airlie Foundation v. Commissioner, 283 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2003), the court laid out the factors for determining whether an organization's activity is of a commercial nature. It said, "Among the major factors courts have considered in assessing commerciality are competition with for profit commercial entities; extent and degree of below cost services provided; pricing policies; and reasonableness of financial reserves. Additional factors include . . . whether the organization uses commercial promotional methods (e.g., advertising) and the extent to which the organization receives charitable donations."

Application of law


You are not exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code because you are not organized or operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes as required by Treas. Reg. Section 501(c)(3)-1(a)(1).

You fail the organizational test and do not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code because your purposes are too broad. Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(1).

You also fail the operational test because you are not operated exclusively for an exempt purpose as described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1). You provide consulting services for a fee based on the time and resources applied to each specific engagement. You do not limit the recipients of your services to any particular group. This is a substantial non-exempt activity similar to a commercial enterprise.

You are like the organization described in Rev. Rul. 69-528 because you provide consulting services for a fee. Also, as explained in Rev. Rul. 72-369, even if you were to limit the recipients of your services to organizations described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, providing consulting services at cost is a commercial operation and not exempt within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3).

Like the organization described in American Institute for Economic Research, you have a significant nonexempt commercial purpose that is not incidental to any educational purpose. Your operations are similar to those described in B.S.W. Group and Airlie Foundation, as your services are competing with a number of nonexempt commercial, for-profit companies through your product pricing pattern, compensated staff, and clients you serve.

You are also similar to the organization described in Living Faith, Inc. You make your services available to the public, you are in direct competition with for-profit businesses, you set your prices based on cost, you advertise your services on your website, and you anticipate F percent of your funding will come from fees received for services performed. These are all indicators that you are operating in a commercial manner, precluding you from exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

Conclusion


Based on the facts presented, we conclude that you do not qualify for recognition of exemption as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. You fail both the organizational and operational tests. Your consulting activities are indistinguishable from similar activities of an ordinary commercial enterprise. Accordingly, you must file federal tax returns and contributions to you are not deductible under Section 170 of the Code.

If you don't agree


You have a right to file a protest if you don't agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, you must send a statement to us within 30 days of the date of this letter. The statement must include:
  • Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone number
  • A copy of this letter highlighting the findings you disagree with
  • An explanation of why you disagree, including any supporting documents
  • The law or authority, if any, you are relying on
  • The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization, or your authorized representative
  • One of the following declarations:
For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I examined this protest statement, including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

For authorized representatives:

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I prepared this protest statement, including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if he or she hasn't already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the IRS and Power of Attorney.

We'll review your protest statement and decide if you provided a basis for us to reconsider our determination. If so, we'll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven't provided a basis for reconsideration, we'll forward your case to the Office of Appeals and notify you. You can find more information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-Exempt Status.

If you don't file a protest within 30 days, you can't seek a declaratory judgment in court at a later date because the law requires that you use the IRS administrative process first (Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code).

Where to send your protest


Please send your protest statement. Form 2848, if needed, and any supporting documents to the applicable address:

U.S. mail:
Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Street address for delivery service:
Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance
550 Main Street, Room 7-008
Cincinnati, OH 45202

You can also fax your statement and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If you fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that he or she received it.

If you agree


If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don't need to do anything. If we don't hear from you within 30 days, we'll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on your income tax filing requirements.

You can find all forms and publications mentioned in this letter on our website at www.irs.gov/formspubs. If you have questions, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

We sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney.

Sincerely,


Jeffrey I. Cooper
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosure:
Publication 892

Published August 25, 2017
Print
Email
Subsribe to RSS Feed

Previous Articles

Scholarship Awards Not Taxable

Grant to Charity Considered Unusual Grant

Foundation's Set-Aside of Funds Approved

Commercial Activity Sinks Marine Science Organization's Exemption

No UBTI on Endowment Units to Trust

scriptsknown

Shelby Harder, 2018
Dr. Irving Auld and Dorothy
Roher Auld Scholarship

"Many students take for granted what a university has to offer. However, I am thankful every single day for the opportunity to attend this prestigious school. At Lawrence, you have the ability to engage in Socratic debates about the world we live in at dinner, play recreational or NCAA sports, and talk one on one with brilliant professors. At Lawrence, you don't just 'learn' a subject, you are immersed in it. You dive into the liberal arts and these professors show you the beauty in it all, and how everything is tied together. I am a Biochemistry major with a soft spot for rocket science, philosophy, and evolution. Lawrence is my dream school, and it would have never been possible without the Dr. Irving Auld and Dorothy Roher Auld Scholarship. I am forever grateful for their generosity."

Max Loebl, 2017
Grace Gates Scholarship and Schade Family Scholarship

"Lawrence has been a life changing opportunity. My experience here is made possible by the Grace Gates Scholarship and the Schade Family Scholarship. I will always be grateful for the generosity that made my life at Lawrence a reality. I am incredibly thankful for the amazing education and lifelong connections I have made here. Beyond a doubt, my time at Lawrence has been a multifarious experience; playing varsity soccer, working in the Volunteer and Community Service Center, and now serving as the President of the Lawrence University Community Council. The times spent at Lawrence will be carried with me and cherished for the rest of my life."

Magdalen D'Alessio, 2017
Lillian Seybold Wells Memorial Scholarship

"Hello, my name is Magdalen D'Alessio, I'm majoring in Psychology and minoring in Education Studies and History. I am extremely thankful to be a recipient of the Lillian Seybold Wells Memorial Scholarship as I have been able to further my education and pursue my extracurricular interests, including Dance Team, and participating in the many International programs offered on campus. I'm really glad to be able to attend Lawrence and hope to expand my knowledge of the world even further! In the near future, I plan to conduct an independent study regarding the relationship between the government and school systems and the importance of parental involvement!"

Joe Johnson, 2017
Amy Aplin Larsen Scholarship

"The Amy Aplin Larsen Scholarship has allowed me to pursue tons of opportunities at Lawrence as part of a liberal arts education. I have been able to take classes from close to a dozen different academic departments, perform in ensembles and theatre productions, and take part in shaping the Lawrence community. Regardless of what field I may go into, the connections I have made here at Lawrence with staff, faculty, and friends have been invaluable. Thank you!"

Milwaukee-Downer Scholarships and Professorships

Some of the many recipients of Milwaukee-Downer scholarships gather for a photo with Carolyn King Stephens M-D'62 and Marlene Crupi-Widen M-D'55 in January 2014 at the annual scholarship luncheon.

Rosamund Victoria Bille Adler Scholarship
Dr. Charles E. Albright Scholarship
Helen Daniels Bader Scholarship
James G. and Ethel M. Barber Scholarship
Catharine Beecher Endowed Fund for Downer Women
Bessie A. Bell Scholarship
Berk Scholarship
Frederick C. Best Scholarship
Beta Study Club Scholarship
Lynde Bradley Scholarship
Lucia R. Briggs-Alumnae Scholarship
Edith Lange Brooks Scholarship
Anne Barman Caldwell Scholarship
Alice Miller Chester Scholarship
City of Milwaukee Student Funds Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1940 Fund
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1942 Fund
College Endowment Association Scholarship
Janet Cope Crawford Scholarship
Jessie Mabbott Daniels Scholarship
F. T. Day Scholarship
Rufus Dodge Scholarship
Julia P. Ely and Hannah R. Vedder Memorial Scholarship
General Endowed Scholarship - M-D College
Dr. Alfred W. and Mrs. Ada F. Gray Scholarship
Berenice E. Hess Scholarship Endowment
Lucille Ray Hibbard Scholarship
Belle Austin Jacobs Scholarship
Helen McDermott Jurack and Ronald J. Mason Scholarship
Marjorie S. Logan Scholarship
Nellie Maxwell Scholarship
S. Annabelle & Paul McGuire Scholarship
Memorial Scholarship Fund - Milwaukee-Downer
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1953 Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1955 Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1956 Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1957 Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1958 and 1959 50th Reunion Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Club Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer/Lawrence College Consolidation 50th Anniversary Scholarship
Francis Evelyn Kelley Morgan Memorial Scholarship
O'Neill-Anderson Family Scholarship Endowment
Elizabeth A. Olson Scholarship
Gilbert Haven Peirce, Sr. and Emma Elizabeth Manor Peirce Milwaukee-Downer Scholarship
Aleida J. Pieters Scholarship
Matilda Siefert Puelicher Scholarship
Elizabeth Ann Richardson Scholarship
William M. Ross Memorial Scholarship
Elizabeth Rossberg Scholarship
Charles Frederic Sammond Scholarship
Mildred L. Schroeder Scholarship
Sivyer Educational Fund for Women
Marion Merrill Smith Scholarship
Dr. Elizabeth A. Steffen Scholarship
W. Mead and Elizabeth McKone Stillman Scholarship
Strzelczyk Family Scholarship
Clare Scherf Sweetman Scholarship
Raymond H. and Jane K. Taylor Scholarship
Jerline E. Walfoort Memorial Scholarship
Barbara E. Wehr Fund
Harmony Weissbach Scholarship
Martha and Frances Wheelock Scholarship
James G. and Ethel M. Barber Professorship of Theatre and Drama
T. A. Chapman Professorship in Music
Alice G. Chapman Professorship in Physics
Alice G. Chapman Librarianship
Milwaukee-Downer College and College Endowment Association Professorship

Kaitlin Yorde, 2017
Maurine Campbell Endowed Scholarship

"I am so thankful to be a recipient of the Maurine Campbell Scholarship. I am the first person in my family to attend a four-year college, and this would not be possible without the scholarships I receive. At Lawrence there are so many wonderful opportunities and learning experiences available. This summer I was able to participate in research in my field and have also been able to get involved with the Appleton community through ESL tutoring at the Fox Valley Literacy Council. I am sure that the Lawrence education I have received will continue to benefit me for the rest of my life!"

LarryU Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube

© Copyright 2017 Crescendo Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved
PRIVACY STATEMENT
This site is informational and educational in nature. It is not offering professional tax, legal, or accounting advice.
For specific advice about the effect of any planning concept on your tax or financial situation or with your estate, please consult a qualified professional advisor.