Title

Text Resize
Print
Email
Subsribe to RSS Feed

Saturday September 23, 2017

Washington News

Washington Hotline

Ryan and Brady Barnstorm for Tax Reform

Barnstorming is defined as "traveling to different places to give speeches."

During the August recess, both the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) and Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) are barnstorming America to promote tax reform.

Ryan met with Wisconsin voters in a public forum on August 21. He expects tax reform to be easier than healthcare reform. Ryan noted, "Tax reform is different. The entire tax reform bill can go into one bill through the House and the Senate. So procedurally, it makes it much easier."

Ryan also expressed a sense of urgency for tax reform. He explained that America is "losing businesses left and right" because of the high corporate tax rate. Ryan continued, "The biggest business we had in Wisconsin—publically traded—was Johnson Controls. The thermostat here is probably a Johnson Controls thermostat. They are now an Irish company. Their worldwide tax rate is 12 ½%."

Brady spoke in Dallas on August 23. He acknowledged that the agreement by the White House and House and Senate leaders to eliminate the border adjustable tax (BAT) will cause many challenges. Eliminating the BAT would reduce revenue by $1 trillion and create a pressing need to find other revenue. Brady explained, "Without the border adjustment revenue, it means we are scrubbing the business side of the tax code to look for the provisions that are not as pro-growth or that, because we are now lowering the rates significantly, just do not pack the punch that they did before."

Nevertheless, Brady agreed that it was important to give up the BAT because "there were too many unknowns, especially for those who import."

Brady also promised to continue an effort to reach out to the Ways and Means Committee Democrats. He previously met with Committee Democrats to discuss potential areas of agreement. Brady stated, "The areas they are looking at as high priorities are ours as well." He pledged to hold more Ways and Means Committee hearings on tax reform.

Speaker Ryan traveled to Oregon and spoke at an Intel manufacturing plant on August 23. Because semiconductors are a very competitive business, he emphasized the need to pass a tax bill to assist American industry. Ryan noted, "We have two to three trillion dollars of American profits parked overseas that cannot come back to be reinvested in our communities because of our tax laws. We are convinced that if we get our tax rates down on all of our business—small businesses, big, and everything in-between—then we can be far more globally competitive, and we can keep our companies based in America."

Editor's Note: It still may be possible to pass a comprehensive tax reform bill by the end of the year. Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV) suggested it may not happen until December 24. He stated, "I believe leadership is going to tell us you are not going home for the holidays until you pass tax reform."

Top Personal Rate is 43.4% - Or 50.9%


In an August 21 letter to Tax Analysts, Federal Policy Group Managing Director Kenneth Kies explained current top tax rates. His letter referred to a comment by former White House aide Steve Bannon suggesting a substantial top tax rate.

Kies was formerly Chief of Staff for the Joint Committee on Taxation (1994-1998). He reviewed the top rates for both personal income and short term capital gains tax.

Personal income is subject to a top ordinary rate of 39.6%, a Medicare tax of 2.9% and for single filers with incomes over $200,000 or married couples with incomes over $250,000, the additional Medicare tax of 0.9%. The total rate for upper income persons is 43.4%.

Short term capital gains are taxed at a top rate of 39.6%. There also is a Medicare tax on passive income and capital gains of 3.8%. The total rate is again 43.4%.

In addition, 43 states levy an income tax. The taxes range from 3.07% in Pennsylvania and a high of 13.3% in California.

Kies noted, "If one were to assume an average rate of 5% - which on a weighted basis is almost certainly low, given the share of U.S. income that is earned by persons in states with rates far above this (for example, California, New Jersey (8.97%), and New York (8.82%)) - then this would mean that the average actual top individual tax rate (combined) is 48.6% (a number that very nearly has a "5" in front of it)."

Editor's Note: One of the key factors driving tax reform is that the U.S. has a higher individual and corporate tax rate than other first-world nations. A high-income person in California may have a combined federal and state rate of 50.9%. If the Pease, PEP and other phase-outs are considered, the actual rate could be even higher.

Three "Misconceptions" on Tax Reform


Scott Greenberg, Senior Analyst with the Tax Foundation Center for Tax Policy, recently published a white paper claiming there are several "misconceptions" about tax reform.

Misconception I - Retroactive Tax Repeal Boosts the Economy

Several Washington Representatives have advocated making tax reductions retroactive to January 1, 2017. House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-NC) stated, "We need to make it retroactive so we unleash the cash and the capital that is sitting there that is ready to be invested."

Media executive Steve Forbes noted, "Very important, the GOP must make these reductions retroactive to beginning of 2017. We want this tax bill to kick up the economy ASAP. And it wouldn't hurt if people got big tax refunds next April."

Greenberg doubts this retroactivity will have the desired impact. If a tax bill is passed in December, workers cannot go back and put in more overtime. Businesses will not be able to change their prior investments and increase the economic return during 2017. Retroactivity appears to have minimal economic effect.

Misconception II - Repatriation will Stimulate Industry

A national media publication suggested that allowing repatriation of corporate funds held overseas could stimulate the economy. The article stated, "Impose a low tax on the repatriation of foreign profits brought back to the United States. This could attract more than $2 trillion to the shores, raising billions for the Treasury while creating new jobs and adding to the United States Gross Domestic Product."

However, Greenburg explains that the companies must do more than simply hold the funds in reserve. The companies still need to believe that investing will lead to profits. Greenberg notes, "Even though a repatriation holiday would put more money in the bank accounts of U.S. companies, it would not change the underlying profitability of making new investments in the United States." He is concerned that the companies would not invest their new profits, but may decide to distribute dividends to their shareholders.

Misconception III - Revenue Neutrality Will Not Grow the Economy

Both Speaker Ryan and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) have supported a revenue-neutral tax reform act. However, former speaker Newt Gingrich holds a different opinion. He argues against revenue neutrality.

Gingrich stated, "Revenue neutrality, on paper, means the bill must bring in the same amount of revenue as current law. So, if you cut taxes in one place, you must raise them elsewhere. A revenue neutral bill would be a tax shuffle rather than a tax cut - and would do nothing to grow the economy."

Greenberg offers a different perspective. He suggests an example of a tax reform bill that lowers a harmful (job reducing) tax by $100 billion and raises a less harmful tax by $100 billion. He notes, "The bill would be revenue-neutral - it would leave the level of federal revenue more or less the same. But even so the bill would grow the U.S. economy, because it would make the tax system less harmful overall."

Editor's Note: The key tax reformers (Brady, Hatch and Ryan) all believe they can reduce deductions, broaden the base, lower tax rates and produce economic growth. Their challenge is to persuade Representatives and Senators to agree on a complex and detailed tax plan.

Applicable Federal Rate of 2.4% for September -- Rev. Rul. 2017-17; 2017-36 IRB 1 (18 Aug 2017)


The IRS has announced the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) for September of 2017. The AFR under Section 7520 for the month of September will be 2.4%. The rates for August of 2.4% or July of 2.2% also may be used. The highest AFR is beneficial for charitable deductions of remainder interests. The lowest AFR is best for lead trusts and life estate reserved agreements. With a gift annuity, if the annuitant desires greater tax-free payments the lowest AFR is preferable. During 2017, pooled income funds in existence less than three tax years must use a 1.2% deemed rate of return. Federal rates are available by clicking here.

Published August 25, 2017
Print
Email
Subsribe to RSS Feed

Previous Articles

'Don't Take the Bait' W-2 Scam

Sen. Hatch and Rep. Neal Discuss Tax Reform

IRS Suggests Defenses Against Ransomware

Personal Identity Theft Down, Business Up

Senate Pivots to Tax Reform

scriptsknown

Shelby Harder, 2018
Dr. Irving Auld and Dorothy
Roher Auld Scholarship

"Many students take for granted what a university has to offer. However, I am thankful every single day for the opportunity to attend this prestigious school. At Lawrence, you have the ability to engage in Socratic debates about the world we live in at dinner, play recreational or NCAA sports, and talk one on one with brilliant professors. At Lawrence, you don't just 'learn' a subject, you are immersed in it. You dive into the liberal arts and these professors show you the beauty in it all, and how everything is tied together. I am a Biochemistry major with a soft spot for rocket science, philosophy, and evolution. Lawrence is my dream school, and it would have never been possible without the Dr. Irving Auld and Dorothy Roher Auld Scholarship. I am forever grateful for their generosity."

Max Loebl, 2017
Grace Gates Scholarship and Schade Family Scholarship

"Lawrence has been a life changing opportunity. My experience here is made possible by the Grace Gates Scholarship and the Schade Family Scholarship. I will always be grateful for the generosity that made my life at Lawrence a reality. I am incredibly thankful for the amazing education and lifelong connections I have made here. Beyond a doubt, my time at Lawrence has been a multifarious experience; playing varsity soccer, working in the Volunteer and Community Service Center, and now serving as the President of the Lawrence University Community Council. The times spent at Lawrence will be carried with me and cherished for the rest of my life."

Magdalen D'Alessio, 2017
Lillian Seybold Wells Memorial Scholarship

"Hello, my name is Magdalen D'Alessio, I'm majoring in Psychology and minoring in Education Studies and History. I am extremely thankful to be a recipient of the Lillian Seybold Wells Memorial Scholarship as I have been able to further my education and pursue my extracurricular interests, including Dance Team, and participating in the many International programs offered on campus. I'm really glad to be able to attend Lawrence and hope to expand my knowledge of the world even further! In the near future, I plan to conduct an independent study regarding the relationship between the government and school systems and the importance of parental involvement!"

Joe Johnson, 2017
Amy Aplin Larsen Scholarship

"The Amy Aplin Larsen Scholarship has allowed me to pursue tons of opportunities at Lawrence as part of a liberal arts education. I have been able to take classes from close to a dozen different academic departments, perform in ensembles and theatre productions, and take part in shaping the Lawrence community. Regardless of what field I may go into, the connections I have made here at Lawrence with staff, faculty, and friends have been invaluable. Thank you!"

Milwaukee-Downer Scholarships and Professorships

Some of the many recipients of Milwaukee-Downer scholarships gather for a photo with Carolyn King Stephens M-D'62 and Marlene Crupi-Widen M-D'55 in January 2014 at the annual scholarship luncheon.

Rosamund Victoria Bille Adler Scholarship
Dr. Charles E. Albright Scholarship
Helen Daniels Bader Scholarship
James G. and Ethel M. Barber Scholarship
Catharine Beecher Endowed Fund for Downer Women
Bessie A. Bell Scholarship
Berk Scholarship
Frederick C. Best Scholarship
Beta Study Club Scholarship
Lynde Bradley Scholarship
Lucia R. Briggs-Alumnae Scholarship
Edith Lange Brooks Scholarship
Anne Barman Caldwell Scholarship
Alice Miller Chester Scholarship
City of Milwaukee Student Funds Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1940 Fund
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1942 Fund
College Endowment Association Scholarship
Janet Cope Crawford Scholarship
Jessie Mabbott Daniels Scholarship
F. T. Day Scholarship
Rufus Dodge Scholarship
Julia P. Ely and Hannah R. Vedder Memorial Scholarship
General Endowed Scholarship - M-D College
Dr. Alfred W. and Mrs. Ada F. Gray Scholarship
Berenice E. Hess Scholarship Endowment
Lucille Ray Hibbard Scholarship
Belle Austin Jacobs Scholarship
Helen McDermott Jurack and Ronald J. Mason Scholarship
Marjorie S. Logan Scholarship
Nellie Maxwell Scholarship
S. Annabelle & Paul McGuire Scholarship
Memorial Scholarship Fund - Milwaukee-Downer
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1953 Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1955 Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1956 Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1957 Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Class of 1958 and 1959 50th Reunion Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer Club Scholarship
Milwaukee-Downer/Lawrence College Consolidation 50th Anniversary Scholarship
Francis Evelyn Kelley Morgan Memorial Scholarship
O'Neill-Anderson Family Scholarship Endowment
Elizabeth A. Olson Scholarship
Gilbert Haven Peirce, Sr. and Emma Elizabeth Manor Peirce Milwaukee-Downer Scholarship
Aleida J. Pieters Scholarship
Matilda Siefert Puelicher Scholarship
Elizabeth Ann Richardson Scholarship
William M. Ross Memorial Scholarship
Elizabeth Rossberg Scholarship
Charles Frederic Sammond Scholarship
Mildred L. Schroeder Scholarship
Sivyer Educational Fund for Women
Marion Merrill Smith Scholarship
Dr. Elizabeth A. Steffen Scholarship
W. Mead and Elizabeth McKone Stillman Scholarship
Strzelczyk Family Scholarship
Clare Scherf Sweetman Scholarship
Raymond H. and Jane K. Taylor Scholarship
Jerline E. Walfoort Memorial Scholarship
Barbara E. Wehr Fund
Harmony Weissbach Scholarship
Martha and Frances Wheelock Scholarship
James G. and Ethel M. Barber Professorship of Theatre and Drama
T. A. Chapman Professorship in Music
Alice G. Chapman Professorship in Physics
Alice G. Chapman Librarianship
Milwaukee-Downer College and College Endowment Association Professorship

Kaitlin Yorde, 2017
Maurine Campbell Endowed Scholarship

"I am so thankful to be a recipient of the Maurine Campbell Scholarship. I am the first person in my family to attend a four-year college, and this would not be possible without the scholarships I receive. At Lawrence there are so many wonderful opportunities and learning experiences available. This summer I was able to participate in research in my field and have also been able to get involved with the Appleton community through ESL tutoring at the Fox Valley Literacy Council. I am sure that the Lawrence education I have received will continue to benefit me for the rest of my life!"

LarryU Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube

© Copyright 2017 Crescendo Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved
PRIVACY STATEMENT
This site is informational and educational in nature. It is not offering professional tax, legal, or accounting advice.
For specific advice about the effect of any planning concept on your tax or financial situation or with your estate, please consult a qualified professional advisor.